# AI reviewer checked the expanded interface

I reviewed the updated HTML and JavaScript on November 12, 2026. I did not run a separate live browser test during this follow-up.

1. **P1. Readers can mistake filtered-out evidence for a missing position.** When an evidence-type filter excludes a member’s existing records, the card and dialog can still say that the researcher found no position. Check whether unfiltered records exist for the selected issue before presenting a research gap. Say that no records match the current filters and offer to clear the evidence-type filter. The dialog should call excluded records other records rather than records on other issues when only their evidence type differs.

2. **P1. Readers need explicit unresolved-lead labels wherever the interface describes gaps.** The current gap helper recognizes blocked sources and a general completed flag but does not distinguish a known unresolved lead. Map follow-up-needed to a pending source review label and preserve its note and linked source in the issue section. Do not let the general member search-completed flag override an issue-specific unresolved lead.

3. **P2. Screen-reader users need unique matrix button names.** Many matrix buttons currently announce only Record or Incomplete. Include the member’s name and issue in each button’s accessible label, and add explicit row and column scopes to table headers. Readers using a screen-reader button list should be able to identify the destination without reconstructing its table coordinates.