2026 MIDTERMS · NOVEMBER 12
New Congress. Addiction policy.
Meet the newcomers and read what they’ve said or done about addiction. Read the election overview ↓
Browse members
No profiles match these filters.
Try a broader state, party, or evidence filter to see more members.
The incoming Congress
AP called Democratic control of both chambers. Read AP’s election chronology ↗
FOR ADDICTION PROFESSIONALS · NOVEMBER 12, 2026
What the records mean for your work
We interpret documented actions here; we cannot predict the incoming Congress’s decisions.
Addiction professionals have specific policies to discuss with some newcomers, while many members’ positions remain unclear. Among 126 reported newcomers, we found addiction-specific records for 65. For the other 61, we found only related health material or no policy record. Their addiction positions remain unknown in our searches.
Chris Rabb cosponsored Pennsylvania legislation in 2025 to expand county-jail medication treatment grants. Read the bill and sponsor list ↗ General Medicaid or mental-health pledges require more specific questions about addiction services.
Professionals can use these records to prepare questions, then follow members’ federal votes and funding decisions. Earlier proposals and state actions do not establish future federal policy. We cannot infer improvements in treatment access or patient outcomes from this roster, and human validation remains pending.
Compare the documented actions ↘Inspect the search coverage ↗START WITH ADDICTION CARE
Choose a policy to compare.
We count reported newcomers with a record on each topic, including support or opposition. These national counts do not measure policy support.
UNDERSTAND THE LIMITS
Inspect the claim.
Check the source.
We distinguish votes from proposals, executive actions, and campaign statements. An earlier action may not describe a member’s current view.
Read the protocol and AI review notes ↗How did we search each member?
We used a common set of searches for addiction treatment and overdose prevention, coverage and related mental health, and medication, substance-specific, or justice policies. Each profile includes the actual query log and the search date. We followed relevant results to their sources when access allowed.
What does “no position found” mean?
We did not locate an attributable position within the documented searches. Search engines can miss archives, votes, and statements. We mark an unfinished review separately and disclose when we could review only indexed text.
Who counts as a newcomer?
We include first-time members, House members entering the Senate, and former members returning after a break. We identify nonvoting delegates separately. We exclude incumbents returning to the same chamber and keep uncalled or conflicting race reports out of the default winner view. We have not checked certification.
How should readers interpret coverage and mental health?
A broad Medicaid or mental health proposal may affect addiction care, but it does not by itself establish support for addiction treatment. We retain that distinction in each record and never infer a position from party membership.
Who reviewed the work?
Codex assembled the records and asked AI reviewers to assess clinical usefulness, usability, and evidence interpretation in the expanded version. These reviewers simulated expert perspectives; they did not test the site with practicing clinicians. Wayne has not validated every entry. Read the critique and revisions ↗
Where do the portraits come from?
We link each portrait to its Wikimedia Commons source and license. We display initials when we have not verified a reusable image. Photographs may predate the election.
View portrait credits ↗FOR RESEARCHERS AND REPORTERS
Follow the complete audit trail.
Download all profiles and evidence, including records outside your current filters. Search logs document what we checked and where we found gaps.